Keep same settings for all tabs

Hello, I keep same settings for all of my files. Same output settings (file title) and attachments for all of my files. I keep same file title (My username) and same logo in the attachments.
So when I have to multiplex hundreds of files with the same settings, I have to put one by one all files to mux. When I choose “create one new multiplex settings tab for each file”, then all other tabs don’t contain my settings. So to keep same settings for all of my files, I have to mux my hundreds of files one by one.

Is there any way to make “Keep same settings for all of the tabs”
So, I will put 100s of files and it will create 100s of tab with the same settings (output settings, file title, attachments) and I will go to “action for all tabs>start multplexing”
By this way, all my 100s files will get multiplexed with my settings. My username as title and my logo as attachment in one click.

Thank Your so much for your help.

Can we do something on this?

The GUI part of the MKVToolNix package is not a batch processing utility. If you need batch capabilities, write small scripts around mkvmerge (see here for examples and here for a longer explanation), or look into third-party GUIs.

I am not a code geek bro. You can just add a feature that “keep same settings as first tab in all tabs” and it will be done. Your help will be much appreciated.
Thanks

I will not add such a feature.

I have saved my desired settings as my.mtxcfg
Now if we set its path in preferences in “Default settings for all tabs” > D:\Folder1/my.mtxcfg
Then even if we open many tabs, settings of all tabs will be automatically set to this settings my.mtxcfg.
So, If I have to mux 100s of files with my settings, it can be done in one click.
What are your views?

I don’t know why you don’t understand a simple “no”, to be quite honest.

Can you please tell me a reason of saying a clear no? Dear mbunkus, This is a forum to ask for a feature, so I asked but you denied instantly. Can you please tell me the reason for this?
Am I doing something wrong? If yes, Extremely Sorry for that.

I already gave you an explanation. This is not its purpose.

A slightly longer answer: implementing a flexible batch GUI that fulfills all (or even most) of the requirements people have sent to me over the years is a hell lot of work, something I’m not willing to invest, especially as all the tasks one could ever want to do can be achieved by the much more flexible way of learning a little bit of scripting (shell, Python, Ruby, doesn’t matter) & automate the existing CLI tools in MKVToolNix, which are designed for automation purposes.